• Users Online: 272
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 63-68

Determinants of influenza patients requiring additional support in adult urban population


1 Department of Internal Medicine, INHS Asvini, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Commanding Officer, INHS Asvini, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Pathology, INHS Asvini, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
4 INS Gharial, Eastern Fleet, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Surg R Adm Naveen Chawla
Commanding Officer INHS Asvini, Mumbai, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jmms.jmms_63_18

Rights and Permissions

Background: Influenza is a global disease with frequent outbreaks which vary in extent and severity. Although Influenza Like Illness (ILI) has a low fatality, it can cause a spurt in hospitalizations and sick absenteeism. Understanding the risk factors and using the knowledge to limit complication is the need of the hour to ensure adequate resource allocation and patient outcome. Aim and Objective: The study analysed the proportion of influenza cases requiring additional supportive care and the factors associated with it in the study population. Material and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 139 patients who were admitted with ILI at a tertiary care centre in Mumbai. Patients records were evaluated in detail for clinical history, socio-demographic details, relevant co-morbidities, physical examination findings and imaging & laboratory investigations. IBM SPSS version 22 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The proportion of Influenza patients requiring additional support (IPRAS) was 18.71%(95% CI 13.1% to 26%) in the study population. The most common additional support was extra oxygen therapy in 53.85% of IPRAS patients. Conclusion: The risk factors with significant association with IPRAS were higher age of the individual, H1N1 influenza, female gender, and presence of 3 or more co-morbidities, presence of fever, cough or breathlessness at presentation, higher respiratory rate and lower SpO2 at the time of presentation.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed60    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded19    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal